Multi-piece solid golf ball

ABSTRACT

In a golf ball having a core, an intermediate layer and a cover, the core is formed of a rubber composition and the intermediate layer and the cover are each formed of a resin composition. The core, the intermediate layer-encased sphere and the ball have respective initial velocities which together satisfy the following two conditions:(initial velocity of ball)&lt;(initial velocity of intermediate layer-encased sphere),0.65≤(initial velocity of intermediate layer-encased sphere)−(initial velocity of core)≤1.15 m/s.Also, letting C and B be the respective deflections in millimeters of the core and the ball when compressed under a specific load, the value of C−B is 1.20 mm or more. This golf ball can achieve a superior distance on shots with a utility club and on shots with irons, and exhibits a good durability to repeated impact and a good controllability in the short game.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This non-provisional application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a) on Patent Application No. 2022-114576 filed in Japan on Jul. 19, 2022, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a multi-piece solid golf ball of three or more layers that has a core, an intermediate layer and a cover.

BACKGROUND ART

Many innovations have been made in designing golf balls with a multilayer construction, and numerous balls that satisfy the needs of not only professional golfers, but also ordinary amateur golfers—ranging from beginners to skilled players—have been developed to date. Many such golf balls have been developed as three-piece solid golf balls having a core, an intermediate layer and a cover (outermost layer). Specifically, the art includes many functional three-piece solid golf balls in which the material hardnesses of the respective layers, such as the intermediate layer and the cover, the core surface hardness and the surface hardness of the intermediate layer-encased sphere have been optimized. Also, a number of technical disclosures have been published which, by focusing on the hardness profile of the core that accounts for most of the ball volume and creating various core interior hardness designs, provide high-performance golf balls.

Examples of such technical literature relating to three-piece solid golf balls include JP-A 2011-120898, JP-A 2016-112308, JP-A 2017-183, JP-A 2017-470, JP-A 2018-183247 and JP-A 2020-175021.

However, although the relationship between the initial velocities of encased spheres such as the intermediate layer-encased sphere and the ball or the relationship between the respective deflections of the core and the ball when compressed under a specific load is disclosed for some of these prior-art golf balls, none are golf balls capable of achieving a superior distance on shots with utility clubs and irons and also having a good controllability on approach shots, a good feel at impact and an excellent durability. Hence there exists, particularly among skilled amateur golfers whose head speed may not be all that fast but who have a low handicap, a desire for a golf ball which can achieve a superior distance on shots with a utility club and on shots with irons.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a golf ball which, when used by a skilled amateur golfer, achieves a superior distance on shots with a utility club and on shots with irons, has a good controllability on approach shots, and also has a good feel at impact and an excellent durability to repeated impact.

As a result of intensive investigations, I have found that, in a multi-piece solid golf ball having a core, an intermediate layer and a cover, by having the relationships among the initial velocity of the core, the initial velocity of the intermediate layer-encased sphere obtained by encasing the core with the intermediate layer and the initial velocity of the ball obtained by encasing the intermediate layer-encased sphere with the cover satisfy the following two conditions:

(initial velocity of ball)<(initial velocity of intermediate layer-encased sphere), and

0.65≤(initial velocity of intermediate layer-encased sphere)−(initial velocity of core)≤1.15 m/s,

and also, letting C and B be the respective deflections in millimeters of the core and the ball when compressed under an initial load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf), by having the value of C−B be 1.20 mm or more, superior distances on shots with a utility club and on shots with irons when used by a skilled amateur golfer, good controllability on approach shots, a good feel at impact and excellent durability to repeated impact can all be obtained.

As used herein, a “skilled amateur golfer” refers to an amateur golfer whose head speed is not as fast as that of a professional golfer, but who has a low handicap. The head speed of such a golfer on shots with a driver (W #1) is generally in the range of 35 to 44 m/s.

Accordingly, the invention provides a multi-piece solid golf ball having a core, an intermediate layer and a cover, wherein the core is formed of a rubber composition, the intermediate layer and the cover are each formed of a resin composition; the core has an initial velocity, the intermediate layer-encased sphere obtained by encasing the core with the intermediate layer has an initial velocity and the ball obtained by encasing the intermediate layer-encased sphere with the cover has an initial velocity which together satisfy the following two conditions:

(initial velocity of ball)<(initial velocity of intermediate layer-encased sphere),

0.65≤(initial velocity of intermediate layer-encased sphere)−(initial velocity of core)≤1.15 m/s; and

letting C and B be the respective deflections in millimeters of the core and the ball when compressed under an initial load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf), the value of C−B is 1.20 mm or more.

In a preferred embodiment of the golf ball according to the invention, the ball satisfies the following condition:

Shore C surface hardness of ball<Shore C surface hardness of intermediate layer encased sphere>Shore C surface hardness of core.

In another preferred embodiment of the inventive golf ball, the resin composition of the intermediate layer includes a high-acid ionomer resin having an acid content of 16 wt % or more.

In yet another preferred embodiment, the intermediate layer has a specific gravity of 1.05 or more.

In still another preferred embodiment, the intermediate layer includes a granular inorganic filler.

In a further preferred embodiment, the cover and the intermediate layer have respective specific gravities with a difference therebetween of not more than 0.15.

In a yet further preferred embodiment, the ball satisfies the following condition:

thickness of cover<thickness of intermediate layer.

In a still further preferred embodiment, the core has a diameter of from 36.7 to 40.1 mm.

In another preferred embodiment, the core has a hardness profile in which, letting Cc be the Shore C hardness at a center of the core, Cs be the Shore C hardness at a surface of the core, Cm be the Shore C hardness at a midpoint M between the core center and the core surface, Cm−2, Cm−4 and Cm−6 be the respective Shore C hardnesses at positions 2 mm, 4 mm and 6 mm inward from the midpoint M and Cm+2, Cm+4 and Cm+6 be the respective Shore C hardnesses at positions 2 mm, 4 mm and 6 mm outward from the midpoint M, and defining surface areas A to F as follows

-   -   surface area A: ½×2×(Cm−4−Cm−6)     -   surface area B: ½×2×(Cm−2−Cm−4)     -   surface area C: ½×2×(Cm−Cm−2)     -   surface area D: ½×2×(Cm+2−Cm)     -   surface area E: ½×2×(Cm+4−Cm+2)     -   surface area F: ½×2×(Cm+6−Cm+4),         the core satisfies the condition:

(surface area E+surface area F)−(surface area A+surface area B)≥1.0.

In a further preferred embodiment, the ball satisfies the following condition:

(surface area D+surface area E)−(surface area B+surface area C)≥1.0.

Advantageous Effects of the Invention

The golf ball of the invention can achieve a superior distance on full shots with a utility club and with irons by, primarily, skilled amateur golfers whose head speeds are not all that fast but who have a low handicap. In addition, the inventive golf ball has a high spin rate on approach shots and thus an excellent playability in the short game. Moreover, this golf ball has a good, soft feel at impact on all shots and also has a good durability to repeated impact

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic cross-sectional view of a golf ball according to one embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 2 is a graph that uses core hardness profile data from Example 1 in order to explain surface areas A to F in a core hardness profile.

FIG. 3 is a graph showing the core hardness profiles in Examples 1 to 3.

FIG. 4 is a graph showing the core hardness profiles in Comparative Examples 1 to 7.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The objects, features and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the appended diagrams.

The multi-piece solid golf ball of the invention, as illustrated in FIG. 1 , has a core, an intermediate layer and a cover. The golf ball G shown in FIG. 1 has a single-layer core 1, a single intermediate layer 2 encasing the core 1, and a single-layer cover 3 encasing the intermediate layer 2. Excluding a coating layer, the cover 3 is positioned as the outermost layer in the layered construction of the golf ball. The core, intermediate layer and cover may, aside from the single layers shown in FIG. 1 , each be composed of a plurality of layers. Numerous dimples D are typically formed on the surface of the cover 3 (outermost layer) in order to enhance the aerodynamic properties. Although not shown in the diagram, a coating layer is generally painted onto the surface of the cover 3. The layers are each described in detail below.

The core is obtained by vulcanizing a rubber composition composed primarily of a rubber material. When the core material is not a rubber composition, the core rebound is low, as a result of which the ball may not travel far. This rubber composition is typically obtained by using a base rubber as the chief ingredient and compounding together with this other ingredients such as a co-crosslinking agent, a crosslinking initiator, an inert filler and an organosulfur compound.

It is preferable to use polybutadiene as the base rubber. A commercial product may be used as the polybutadiene. Illustrative examples include BR01, BR51 and BR730 (all from JSR Corporation). The proportion of polybutadiene within the base rubber is preferably at least 60 wt %, and more preferably at least 80 wt %. Rubber ingredients other than the above polybutadiene may be included in the base rubber, provided that doing so does not detract from the advantageous effects of the invention. Examples of rubber ingredients other than the above polybutadiene include other polybutadienes and also other diene rubbers, such as styrene-butadiene rubbers, natural rubbers, isoprene rubbers and ethylene-propylene-diene rubbers.

The co-crosslinking agent is an α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid and/or a metal salt thereof. Specific examples of unsaturated carboxylic acids include acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, maleic acid and fumaric acid. The use of acrylic acid or methacrylic acid is especially preferred. Metal salts of unsaturated carboxylic acids include, without particular limitation, the above unsaturated carboxylic acids that have been neutralized with desired metal ions. Specific examples include the zinc salts and magnesium salts of methacrylic acid and acrylic acid. The use of zinc acrylate is especially preferred.

The unsaturated carboxylic acid and/or metal salt thereof is included in an amount, per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber, which is typically least 5 parts by weight, preferably at least 9 parts by weight, and more preferably at least 13 parts by weight. The amount included is typically not more than 60 parts by weight, preferably not more than 50 parts by weight, and more preferably not more than 40 parts by weight. Too much may make the core too hard, giving the ball an unpleasant feel at impact, whereas too little may lower the rebound.

It is suitable to use an organic peroxide as the crosslinking initiator. A commercially available organic peroxide may be used for this purpose. Examples of such products that may be suitably used include Percumyl D, Perhexa C-40 and Perhexa 3M (all from NOF Corporation), and Luperco 231XL (from AtoChem Co.). One of these may be used alone, or two or more may be used together. The amount of organic peroxide included per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber is preferably at least 0.1 part by weight, more preferably at least part by weight, and even more preferably at least 0.5 part by weight. The upper limit is preferably not more than 5 parts by weight, more preferably not more than 4 parts by weight, even more preferably not more than 3 parts by weight, and most preferably not more than 2.5 parts by weight. When too much or too little is included, it may not be possible to obtain a golf ball having a good feel, durability and rebound.

Fillers that may be suitably used include, for example, zinc oxide, barium sulfate and calcium carbonate. One of these may be used alone, or two or more may be used together. The amount of inert filler included per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber is preferably at least 1 part by weight, and more preferably at least 3 parts by weight. The upper limit per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber is preferably not more than 50 parts by weight, more preferably not more than 40 parts by weight, and even more preferably not more than 30 parts by weight. Too much or too little inert filler may make it impossible to obtain a proper weight and a suitable rebound.

Commercial products such as Nocrac NS-6, Nocrac NS-30, Nocrac 200 and Nocrac MB (all available from Ouchi Shinko Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.) may be used as antioxidants. One of these may be used alone, or two or more may be used together.

The amount of antioxidant included per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber, although not particularly limited, is preferably at least 0.05 part by weight, and more preferably at least 0.1 part by weight, The upper limit is preferably not more than 1.0 part by weight, more preferably not more than 0.7 part by weight, and even more preferably not more than 0.5 part by weight. Too much or too little antioxidant may make it impossible to achieve a suitable core hardness gradient and a suitable rebound, durability and spin rate-lowering effect on full shots.

In addition, an organosulfur compound may be included in the rubber composition so as to impart an excellent rebound. Specifically, it is recommended that thiophenols, thionaphthols, halogenated thiophenols or metal salts of these be included. Specific examples include pentachlorothiophenol, pentafluorothiophenol, pentabromothiophenol, p chlorothiophenol, the zinc salt of pentachlorothiophenol, and any of the following having 2 to 4 sulfur atoms: diphenylpolysulfides, dibenzylpolysulfides, dibenzoylpolysulfides, dibenzothiazoylpolysulfides and dithiobenzoylpolysulfides. The use of diphenyldisulfide or the zinc salt of pentachlorothiophenol is especially preferred.

The organosulfur compound is included in an amount per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber that is preferably not more than 5 parts by weight, more preferably not more than 4 parts by weight, even more preferably not more than 3 parts by weight, and most preferably not more than 2 parts by weight. The lower limit in the amount included is preferably at least 0.1 part by weight, more preferably at least 0.2 part by weight, and even more preferably at least 0.3 part by weight. Including too much organosulfur compound may make the hardness too low. On the other hand, including too little may make a rebound-improving effect unlikely.

Water may be included in the rubber composition. This water, although not particularly limited, may be distilled water or tap water. The use of distilled water that is free of impurities is especially suitable. The amount of water included per 100 parts by weight of the base rubber is preferably at least 0.1 part by weight, and more preferably at least 0.2 part by weight. The upper limit is preferably not more than 2 parts by weight, and more preferably not more than 1.5 parts by weight. Decomposition of the organic peroxide within the core formulation can be promoted

by the direct addition of water or a water-containing material to the core material. The decomposition efficiency of the organic peroxide within the core-forming rubber composition is known to change with temperature; starting at a given temperature, the decomposition efficiency rises with increasing temperature. If the temperature is too high, the amount of decomposed radicals rises excessively, leading to recombination between radicals and, ultimately, deactivation. As a result, fewer radicals act effectively in crosslinking. Here, when a heat of decomposition is generated by decomposition of the organic peroxide at the time of core vulcanization, the vicinity of the core surface remains at substantially the same temperature as the temperature of the vulcanization mold, but the temperature near the core center, due to the build-up of heat of decomposition by the organic peroxide which has decomposed from the outside, becomes considerably higher than the mold temperature. In cases where water or a water-containing material is added directly to the core, because the water acts to promote decomposition of the organic peroxide, radical reactions like those described above can be made to differ at the core center and core surface. That is, decomposition of the organic peroxide is further promoted near the center of the core, bringing about greater radical deactivation, which leads to a further decrease in the amount of active radicals. As a result, it is possible to obtain a core in which the crosslink densities at the core center and the core surface differ markedly.

The core can be produced by vulcanizing and curing the rubber composition containing the above ingredients. For example, the core can be produced by using a Banbury mixer, roll mill or other mixing apparatus to intensively mix the rubber composition, subsequently compression molding or injection molding the mixture in a core mold, and curing the resulting molded body by suitably heating it under conditions sufficient to allow the organic peroxide or co-crosslinking agent to act, such as at a temperature of between 100 and 200° C., preferably between 140 and 180° C., for 10 to 40 minutes.

In this invention, the core may be formed as a single layer or as a plurality of layers, although it is preferably formed as a single layer. When a rubber core composed of a plurality of layers is produced, in cases where the hardness difference at the interface between these rubber layers is large, layer separation at the interface may arise when the ball is repeatedly struck, possibly leading to a loss in the initial velocity of the ball on full shots.

The core has a diameter that is preferably at least 36.7 mm, more preferably at least 37.2 mm, and even more preferably at least 37.6 mm. The upper limit in the core diameter is preferably not more than 40.1 mm, more preferably not more than 39.0 mm, and even more preferably not more than 38.0 mm. When the core diameter is too small, the initial velocity of the ball may decrease or the deflection by the ball as a whole may become smaller, ultimately leading to a rise in the spin rate of the ball on full shots, as a result of which the intended distance may be unattainable. On the other hand, when the core diameter is too large, the spin rate on full shots may rise, likewise making the intended distance unattainable, or the durability to cracking on repeated impact may worsen.

The core has a deflection when compressed under a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf) which, although not particularly limited, is preferably at least 3.8 mm, more preferably at least 4.0 mm, and even more preferably at least 4.2 mm. The upper limit is preferably not more than 6.0 mm, more preferably not more than 5.4 mm, and even more preferably not more than 5.0 mm. When the core deflection is too small, i.e., when the core is too hard, the spin rate of the ball may rise excessively, resulting in a poor flight, or the feel at impact may become too hard. On the other hand, when the core deflection is too large, i.e., when the core is too soft, the ball rebound may become too low, resulting in a poor flight, the feel at impact may become too soft, or the durability to cracking on repeated impact may worsen.

Next, the hardness profile of the core is described. The core hardnesses mentioned below refer to Shore C hardnesses. These Shore C hardnesses are hardness values measured with a Shore C durometer in accordance with ASTM D2240.

The core center hardness Cc is preferably at least 47, more preferably at least 49, and even more preferably at least 51. The upper limit is preferably not more than 58, more preferably not more than 56, and even more preferably not more than 54. When this value is too large, the feel at impact may become hard or the spin rate on full shots may rise, as a result of which the intended distance may be unattainable. On the other hand, when this value is too small, the rebound may become low, resulting in a poor flight, or the durability to cracking on repeated impact may worsen.

The hardness Cm−6 at a position 6 mm inward from a midpoint M between the core center and the core surface, although not particularly limited, may be set to preferably at least 47, more preferably at least 49, and even more preferably at least 51. Although there is no particular upper limit, the hardness Cm−6 may be set to preferably not more than 58, more preferably not more than 56, and even more preferably not more than 54. Hardnesses that deviate from these values may lead to undesirable results similar to those described above for the core center hardness Cc.

The hardness Cm−4 at a position 4 mm inward from the midpoint M of the core, although not particularly limited, may be set to preferably at least 47, more preferably at least 49, and even more preferably at least 51. Although there is no particular upper limit, the hardness Cm−4 may be set to preferably not more than 58, more preferably not more than 56, and even more preferably not more than 54. Hardnesses that deviate from these values may lead to undesirable results similar to those described above for the core center hardness Cc.

The hardness Cm−2 at a position 2 mm inward from the midpoint M of the core, although not particularly limited, may be set to preferably at least 49, more preferably at least 51, and even more preferably at least 53. Although there is no particular upper limit, the hardness Cm−2 may be set to preferably not more than 59, more preferably not more than 57, and even more preferably not more than 55. Hardnesses that deviate from these values may lead to undesirable results similar to those described above for the core center hardness Cc.

The cross-sectional hardness Cm at the midpoint M of the core, although not particularly limited, may be set to preferably at least 53, more preferably at least 55, and even more preferably at least 57. Although there is no particular upper limit, the hardness Cm may be set to preferably not more than 63, more preferably not more than 61, and even more preferably not more than 59. Hardnesses that deviate from these values may lead to undesirable results similar to those described above for the core center hardness Cc.

The core surface hardness Cs is preferably at least 71, more preferably at least 73, and even more preferably at least 75. The upper limit is preferably not more than 84, more preferably not more than 82, and even more preferably not more than 80. When this value is too large, the durability to cracking on repeated impact may worsen or the feel at impact may become too hard. On the other hand, when this value is too small, the rebound may become small, resulting in a poor flight, or the spin rate on full shots may rise and the intended distance may be unattainable.

The hardness Cm+2 at a position 2 mm outward toward the core surface from the midpoint M of the core, although not particularly limited, may be set to preferably at least 57, more preferably at least 59, and even more preferably at least 61. Although there is no particular upper limit, the hardness Cm+2 may be set to preferably not more than 68, more preferably not more than 66, and even more preferably not more than 64. Hardnesses that deviate from these values may lead to undesirable results similar to those described above for the core surface hardness Cs.

The hardness Cm+4 at a position 4 mm outward from the midpoint M of the core, although not particularly limited, may be set to preferably at least 61, more preferably at least 63, and even more preferably at least 65. Although there is no particular upper limit, the hardness Cm+4 may be set to preferably not more than 73, more preferably not more than 71, and even more preferably not more than 69. Hardnesses that deviate from these values may lead to undesirable results similar to those described above for the core surface hardness Cs.

The hardness Cm+6 at a position 6 mm outward toward the core surface from the midpoint M of the core, although not particularly limited, may be set to preferably at least 64, more preferably at least 66, and even more preferably at least 68. Although there is no particular upper limit, the hardness Cm+6 may be set to preferably not more than 77, more preferably not more than 75, and even more preferably not more than 73. Hardnesses that deviate from these values may lead to undesirable results similar to those described above for the core surface hardness Cs.

In the above-described core hardness profile in this invention, the surface areas A to F defined as follows:

-   -   surface area A: ½×2×(Cm−4−Cm−6)     -   surface area B: ½×2×(Cm−2−Cm−4)     -   surface area C: ½×2×(Cm−Cm−2)     -   surface area D: ½×2×(Cm+2−Cm)     -   surface area E: ½×2×(Cm+4−Cm+2)     -   surface area F: ½×2×(Cm+6−Cm+4),         are characterized in that the value of (surface area E+surface         area F)−(surface area A+surface area B) is preferably 1.0 or         more, more preferably 2.5 or more, and even more preferably 4.0         or more, and the upper limit is preferably not more than 20.0,         more preferably not more than 16.0, and even more preferably not         more than 10.0. When this value is too large, the durability to         cracking on repeated impact may worsen. On the other hand, when         this value is too small, the spin rate of the ball on full shots         may rise and the intended distance may be unattainable.

The value of (surface area D+surface area E)−(surface area B+surface area C) is preferably 1.0 or more, more preferably 2.0 or more, and even more preferably 3.0 or more, and the upper limit is preferably not more than 20.0, more preferably not more than 16.0, and even more preferably not more than 10.0. When this value is too large, the durability to cracking on repeated impact may worsen. On the other hand, when this value is too small, the spin rate of the ball on full shots may rise and the intended distance may be unattainable.

Surface areas A to F preferably satisfy the condition

surface area A<surface area C<(surface area E+surface area F)

and also the condition

surface area B<surface area C<(surface area E+surface area F);

and more preferably satisfy the condition

surface area A<surface area C<surface area D<(surface area E+surface area F) and also the condition

surface area B<surface area C<surface area D<(surface area E+surface area F).

When these conditions are not satisfied, the spin rate of the ball on full shots may rise and the intended distance may be unattainable.

FIG. 2 shows a graph that uses core hardness profile data from Example 1 to explain surface areas A to F. As is apparent from the graph, each of surface areas A to F is the surface area of a triangle whose base is the difference between specific distances from the core center and whose height is the difference in hardness between the positions at these specific distances.

The core has an initial velocity of preferably at least 75.3 m/s, more preferably at least 75.8 m/s, and even more preferably at least 76.3 m/s. The upper limit is preferably not more than 77.5 m/s, more preferably not more than 77.0 m/s, and even more preferably not more than 76.7 m/s. When the core initial velocity is too high, the ball initial velocity may become too high and ultimately fall outside the range specified in the Rules of Golf. On the other hand, when the core initial velocity is too low, the ball rebound on full shots may become low or the spin rate may rise, as a result of which the intended distance may be unattainable. The initial velocity value in this case is a numerical value measured with a COR-type initial velocity tester designed and built according to R&A (The Royal & Ancient Golf Club of St. Andrews) protocols. Specifically, a COR-type initial velocity tester produced by Hye Precision Products (U.S.A.) is used. The conditions at the time of measurement involve changing the air pressure in four stages and taking measurements, establishing a relationship between the inbound velocity and the coefficient of restitution (COR), and determining the initial velocity at an inbound velocity of 43.83 m/s from this relationship. Regarding the measurement environment of the COR-type initial velocity tester, measurements are carried out at a room temperature of 23.9±2° C. using a ball that has been temperature-conditioned for at least 3 hours in a thermostatic chamber adjusted to 23.9±1° C.

Next, the intermediate layer is described.

The intermediate layer has a material hardness on the Shore C hardness scale which, although not particularly limited, is preferably at least 90, more preferably at least 92 and even more preferably at least 93, but is preferably not more than 100, more preferably not more than 98 and even more preferably not more than 96. The material hardness on the Shore D hardness scale is preferably at least 64, more preferably at least 66 and even more preferably at least 68, but is preferably not more than 75, more preferably not more than 72 and even more preferably not more than 70.

The sphere obtained by encasing the core with the intermediate layer (intermediate layer-encased sphere) has a surface hardness which, on the Shore C hardness scale, is preferably at least 95, more preferably at least 96, and even more preferably at least 97. The upper limit is preferably not more than 100, more preferably not more than 99, and even more preferably not more than 98. The surface hardness on the Shore D hardness scale is preferably at least 68, more preferably at least 69, and even more preferably at least 70. The upper limit is preferably not more than 78, more preferably not more than 75, and even more preferably not more than 72.

When the material and surface hardnesses of the intermediate layer are lower than the above ranges, the spin rate of the ball on full shots may rise excessively, resulting in a poor distance, or the initial velocity may become low, likewise resulting in a poor distance. On the other hand, when the material and surface hardnesses of the intermediate layer are higher than the above ranges, the durability to cracking on repeated impact may worsen or the feel at impact on shots with a putter or on short approaches may become too hard.

The intermediate layer has a thickness which is preferably at least 1.00 mm, more preferably at least 1.25 mm, and even more preferably at least 1.45 mm. The intermediate layer thickness has an upper limit that is preferably not more than 1.80 mm, more preferably not more than 1.65 mm, and even more preferably not more than 1.55 mm. It is preferable for the intermediate layer to be thicker than the subsequently described cover. When the intermediate layer thickness falls outside of the above range or the intermediate layer is thinner than the cover, the ball spin rate-lowering effect on shots with a driver (W #1) may be inadequate, resulting in a poor distance. Also, when the intermediate layer is too thin, the durability to cracking on repeated impact and the low-temperature durability may worsen.

The value obtained by subtracting the cover thickness from the intermediate layer thickness is preferably larger than 0 mm, more preferably 0.3 mm or more, and even more preferably 0.5 mm or more. The upper limit is preferably not more than 1.5 mm, more preferably not more than 1.0 mm, and even more preferably not more than 0.7 mm. When this value falls outside of the above range, the spin rate of the ball on full shots may rise or the initial velocity on shots may become low, as a result of which the intended distance may be unattainable. When this value is too small, the durability to cracking on repeated impact may worsen.

It is preferable to use an ionomer resin as the chief material in the intermediate layer material.

The ionomer resin material preferably includes a high-acid ionomer resin having an unsaturated carboxylic acid content (also referred to below as the “acid content”) of at least 16 wt %.

The amount of high-acid ionomer resin included per 100 wt % of the resin material is preferably at least 20 wt %, more preferably at least 30 wt %, and even more preferably at least 60 wt %. The upper limit is preferably 100 wt % or less, more preferably 90 wt % or less, and even more preferably 85 wt % or less. When the content of this high-acid ionomer resin is too low, the spin rate of the ball on full shots may rise and a good distance may not be attained. On the other hand, when the content of this high-acid ionomer resin is too high, the durability to repeated impact may worsen.

In cases where an ionomer resin is employed as the chief material, an embodiment that uses in admixture a zinc-neutralized ionomer resin and a sodium-neutralized ionomer resin as the chief material is desirable. The blending ratio therebetween, expressed as the weight ratio of zinc-neutralized ionomer to sodium-neutralized ionomer, is from 5/95 to 95/5, preferably from 10/90 to 90/10, and more preferably from 15/85 to 85/15. When the zinc neutralized ionomer and sodium-neutralized ionomer are not included in a ratio within this range, the rebound may become too low and the desired distance may be unattainable, the durability to cracking on repeated impact at normal temperatures may worsen, or the durability to cracking at low temperatures (subzero Centigrade) may worsen.

Depending on the intended use, optional additives may be suitably included in the intermediate layer material. For example, pigments, dispersants, antioxidants, ultraviolet absorbers and light stabilizers may be added. When these additives are included, the amount added per 100 parts by weight of the base resin is preferably at least 0.1 part by weight, and more preferably at least 0.5 part by weight. The upper limit is preferably not more than 10 parts by weight, and more preferably not more than 4 parts by weight.

It is desirable to abrade the surface of the intermediate layer in order to increase adhesion of the intermediate layer material with the polyurethane that is preferably used in the subsequently described cover material. In addition, it is desirable to apply a primer (adhesive) to the surface of the intermediate layer following such abrasion treatment or to add an adhesion reinforcing agent to the intermediate layer material.

A granular inorganic filler may be included in the intermediate layer material. Examples of granular inorganic fillers that may be suitably used include, without particular limitation, zinc oxide, barium sulfate and titanium dioxide. To obtain an excellent durability to cracking on repeated impact, the use of barium sulfate is preferred, with the use of precipitated barium sulfate being especially preferred.

The granular inorganic filler has an average particle size which, although not particularly limited, is set to preferably from 0.01 to 100 μm, and more preferably from 0.1 to 10 μm. When the average particle size of the granular inorganic filler is too small or too large, the dispersibility during preparation of the material may worsen. As used herein, “average particle size” refers to the particle size obtained by dispersing the granular inorganic filler in an aqueous solution together with a suitable dispersant and carrying out measurement with a particle size analyzer.

The content of the granular inorganic filler is not particularly limited, although the content is preferably set to at least 0 part by weight, more preferably at least 10 parts by weight, and even more preferably at least 15 parts, per 100 parts by weight of the base resin of the intermediate layer material. Although there is no particular upper limit, the content is preferably not more than 50 parts by weight, more preferably not more than 40 parts by weight, and even more preferably not more than 30 parts by weight. At a granular inorganic filler content that is too low, the durability to cracking on repeated impact may worsen. On the other hand, at a granular inorganic filler content that is too high, the ball rebound may decrease or the spin rate of the ball on full shots may rise, as a result of which the intended distance may not be achieved.

The intermediate layer has a specific gravity which is preferably at least 1.05, more preferably at least 1.07, and even more preferably at least 1.09. The upper limit is preferably not more than 1.25, more preferably not more than 1.20, and even more preferably not more than 1.15. When the specific gravity of the intermediate layer is too small, the durability to cracking on repeated impact may worsen. On the other hand, when the specific gravity is too large, the ball rebound may decrease or the spin rate of the ball on full shots may rise, as a result of which the intended distance may not be achieved.

The intermediate layer-encased sphere has an initial velocity which is preferably at least 77.0 m/s, more preferably at least 77.3 m/s, and even more preferably at least 77.5 m/s. The upper limit is preferably not more than 78.5 m/s, more preferably not more than 78.2 m/s, and even more preferably not more than 77.9 m/s. When this initial velocity is too high, the ball initial velocity may become too high and end up falling outside the range specified in the Rules of Golf. On the other hand, when this initial velocity is too low, the ball rebound on full shots may become low or the spin rate may rise, as a result of which the intended distance may be unattainable. The initial velocity in this case is measured with the same device and under the same conditions as described above for measurement of the initial velocity of the core.

Next, the cover is described.

The cover has a material hardness on the Shore C hardness scale which, although not particularly limited, is preferably at least 50, more preferably at least 57 and even more preferably at least 63, but is preferably not more than 80, more preferably not more than 74 and even more preferably not more than 70. The material hardness on the Shore D hardness scale is preferably at least 30, more preferably at least 35 and even more preferably at least 40, but is preferably not more than 53, more preferably not more than 50 and even more preferably not more than 47.

The sphere obtained by encasing the intermediate layer-encased sphere with the cover—that is, the ball—has a surface hardness which, on the Shore C hardness scale, is preferably at least 73, more preferably at least 78 and even more preferably at least 83, but is preferably not more than 95, more preferably not more than 92 and even more preferably not more than 90. The surface hardness on the Shore D hardness scale is preferably at least 50, more preferably at least 53 and even more preferably at least 56, but is preferably not more than 70, more preferably not more than 65 and even more preferably not more than 60. When the material hardness and surface hardness of the cover are lower than the above respective ranges, the spin rate of the ball on full shots may rise and a good distance may not be achieved. On the other hand, when the material hardness and surface hardness of the cover are too high, the ball may not be receptive to spin on approach shots or the scuff resistance may worsen.

The cover has a thickness of preferably at least 0.3 mm, more preferably at least 0.45 mm, and even more preferably at least 0.6 mm. The upper limit in the cover thickness is preferably not more than 1.2 mm, more preferably not more than 0.9 mm, and even more preferably not more than 0.8 mm. When the cover is too thick, the rebound of the ball on full shots may be inadequate or the spin rate may rise, as a result of which a good distance may not be achieved. On the other hand, when the cover is too thin, the scuff resistance may worsen or the ball may not be receptive to spin on approach shots and may thus lack sufficient controllability.

Various thermoplastic resins employed as cover stock in golf balls may be used as the cover material. For reasons having to do with the spin controllability of the ball in the short game and the scuff resistance, the use of a resin material composed primarily of a thermoplastic urethane is preferred. That is, the cover is preferably formed of a resin blend in which the main components are (I) a thermoplastic polyurethane and (II) a polyisocyanate compound.

It is recommended that the combined weight of components I and II be at least 60%, and preferably at least 70%, of the overall amount of the cover-forming resin composition. Components I and II are described in detail below.

The thermoplastic polyurethane (I) has a structure which includes soft segments composed of a polymeric polyol (polymeric glycol) that is a long-chain polyol and hard segments composed of a chain extender and a polyisocyanate compound. Here, the long chain polyol serving as a starting material may be any that has hitherto been used in the art relating to thermoplastic polyurethanes, and is not particularly limited. Illustrative examples include polyester polyols, polyether polyols, polycarbonate polyols, polyester polycarbonate polyols, polyolefin polyols, conjugated diene polymer-based polyols, castor oil-based polyols, silicone-based polyols and vinyl polymer-based polyols. These long-chain polyols may be used singly, or two or more may be used in combination. Of these, in terms of being able to synthesize a thermoplastic polyurethane having a high rebound resilience and excellent low-temperature properties, a polyether polyol is preferred.

Any chain extender that has hitherto been employed in the art relating to thermoplastic polyurethanes may be suitably used as the chain extender. For example, low-molecular-weight compounds with a molecular weight of 400 or less which have on the molecule two or more active hydrogen atoms capable of reacting with isocyanate groups are preferred. Illustrative, non-limiting, examples of the chain extender include 1,4-butylene glycol, 1,2-ethylene glycol, 1,3-butanediol, 1,6-hexanediol and 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-propanediol. Of these, the chain extender is preferably an aliphatic diol having from 2 to 12 carbon atoms, and is more preferably 1,4-butylene glycol.

Any polyisocyanate compound hitherto employed in the art relating to thermoplastic polyurethanes may be suitably used without particular limitation as the polyisocyanate compound. For example, use may be made of one or more selected from the group consisting of 4,4′-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, 2,4-toluene diisocyanate, 2,6 toluene diisocyanate, p-phenylene diisocyanate, xylylene diisocyanate, 1,5-naphthylene diisocyanate, tetramethylxylene diisocyanate, hydrogenated xylylene diisocyanate, dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate, tetramethylene diisocyanate, hexamethylene diisocyanate, isophorone diisocyanate, norbornene diisocyanate, trimethylhexamethylene diisocyanate and dimer acid diisocyanate. However, depending on the type of isocyanate, the crosslinking reactions during injection molding may be difficult to control. In the practice of the invention, to provide a balance between stability at the time of production and the properties that are manifested, it is most preferable to use the following aromatic diisocyanate: 4,4′ diphenylmethane diisocyanate.

A commercially available product may be used as the thermoplastic polyurethane serving as component I. Illustrative examples include Pandex T-8295, Pandex T-8290 and Pandex T-8260 (all from DIC Covestro Polymer, Ltd.).

A thermoplastic elastomer other than the above thermoplastic polyurethanes may also be optionally included as a separate component, i.e., component III, together with above components I and II. By including this component III in the above resin blend, the flowability of the resin blend can be further improved and properties required of the golf ball cover material, such as resilience and scuff resistance, can be enhanced.

The compositional ratio of above components I, II and III is not particularly limited. However, to fully elicit the advantageous effects of the invention, the compositional ratio I:II:III is preferably in a weight ratio range of from 100:2:50 to 100:50:0, and more preferably in a range of from 100:2:50 to 100:30:8.

In addition, various additives other than the ingredients making up the above thermoplastic polyurethane may be optionally included in this resin blend. For example, pigments, dispersants, antioxidants, light stabilizers, ultraviolet absorbers and internal mold lubricants may be suitably included.

The cover has a specific gravity which, although not particularly limited, is preferably at least 1.00, more preferably at least 1.03, and even more preferably at least 1.06. The upper limit is preferably not more than 1.20, more preferably not more than 1.17, and even more preferably not more than 1.14. When the cover specific gravity is lower than the above range, the ratio of low specific gravity materials such as ionomer blended into the cover made chiefly of urethane ends up becoming high, as a result of which the scuff resistance may worsen. On the other hand, when the cover specific gravity is too high, the amount of filler added is high and the rebound may become too low, as a result of which the intended distance may be unattainable.

The manufacture of multi-piece solid golf balls in which the above-described core, intermediate layer and cover (outermost layer) are formed as successive layers may be carried out by a customary method such as a known injection molding process. For example, a multi-piece golf ball can be produced by injection-molding the intermediate layer material over the core in an injection mold so as to obtain an intermediate layer-encased sphere and then, last of all, injection-molding the material for the cover serving as the outermost layer over the intermediate layer-encased sphere. Alternatively, the respective encasing layers (i.e., the intermediate layer and the cover) may be formed by, in each case, furnishing two half-cups that have been molded into hemispherical shapes, enclosing the core or the intermediate layer-enclosed sphere within the half-cups and then molding under applied heat and pressure.

The golf ball has a deflection when compressed under a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf) which is preferably at least 2.7 mm, more preferably at least 2.9 mm, and even more preferably at least 3.0 mm. The deflection upper limit is preferably not more than 3.8 mm, more preferably not more than 3.6 mm, and even more preferably not more than 3.4 mm. When the golf ball deflection is too small, i.e., when the ball is too hard, the spin rate may rise excessively, resulting in a poor flight, or the feel at impact may be too hard. On the other hand, when the deflection is too large, i.e., when the ball is too soft, the ball rebound may be too low, resulting in a poor flight, the feel at impact may be too soft, or the durability to cracking under repeated impact may worsen.

The ball has an initial velocity which is preferably at least 76.8 m/s, more preferably at least 77.0 m/s, and even more preferably at least 77.2 m/s. The upper limit is preferably not more than 77.724 m/s. A ball initial velocity that is too high may fall outside the range specified in the Rules of Golf. On the other hand, when the ball initial velocity is too low, the ball may not travel well on full shots. The initial velocity in this case is measured with the same device and under the same conditions as described above for measurement of the initial velocities of the core and the intermediate layer-encased sphere.

Surface Hardness Relationships Among Spheres

The value obtained by subtracting the surface hardness of the core from the surface hardness of the intermediate layer-encased sphere, expressed on the Shore C hardness scale, is preferably 5 or more, more preferably 10 or more, and even more preferably 16 or more. The upper limit is preferably not more than 32, more preferably not more than 28, and even more preferably not more than 25. When this value falls outside of the above range, the spin rate of the ball on full shots may rise and the intended distance may become unattainable.

The value obtained by subtracting the center hardness of the core from the surface hardness of the intermediate layer-encased sphere, expressed on the Shore C hardness scale, is preferably 40 or more, more preferably 41 or more, and even more preferably 42 or more. The upper limit is preferably not more than 53, more preferably not more than 50, and even more preferably not more than 47. When this value is too small, the spin rate of the ball on full shots may rise and the intended distance may not be achieved. On the other hand, when this value is too large, the durability of the ball to cracking on repeated impact may worsen or the initial velocity on shots may become lower, as a result of which the intended distance may become unattainable.

The value obtained by subtracting the surface hardness of the ball from the surface hardness of the intermediate layer-encased sphere, expressed on the Shore C hardness scale, is preferably 2 or more, more preferably 4 or more, and even more preferably 6 or more. The upper limit is preferably not more than 25, more preferably not more than 17, and even more preferably not more than 14. When this value is too small, the controllability of the ball in the short game may worsen. On the other hand, when this value is too large, the spin rate on full shots may rise, as a result of which the intended distance may become unattainable.

Initial Velocity Relationships Among Spheres

It is critical for the relationship among the initial velocity of the core, the initial velocity of the intermediate layer-encased sphere and the initial velocity of the ball to satisfy the following two conditions:

(initial velocity of ball)<(initial velocity of intermediate layer-encased sphere),

0.65≤(initial velocity of intermediate layer-encased sphere)−(initial velocity of core)≤1.15 m/s.

By optimizing the initial velocity relationships among these spheres, the spin rate on full shots is held down, enabling the desired distance to be attained, and a good durability to cracking on repeated impact is achieved.

The value obtained by subtracting the initial velocity of the ball from the initial velocity of the intermediate layer-encased sphere is greater than 0 m/s, preferably 0.10 m/s or more, and more preferably 0.30 m/s or more. The upper limit is preferably not more than 1.00 m/s, more preferably not more than 0.70 m/s, and even more preferably not more than m/s. When this value is too large, the spin rate of the ball on full shots may rise or the initial velocity on shots may decrease, as a result of which the intended distance may be unattainable. On the other hand, when this value is too small, in cases where the small value is due to the cover, the cover becomes hard and the ball is less receptive to spin in the short game, or the durability to cracking on repeated impact worsens. In cases where this small value is due to the intermediate layer, the spin rate of the ball on full shots may rise and the intended distance may be unattainable.

The value obtained by subtracting the initial velocity of the core from the initial velocity of the intermediate layer-encased sphere is 0.65 m/s or more, preferably 0.75 m/s or more, and more preferably 0.90 m/s or more. The upper limit is preferably not more than 1.15 m/s, more preferably not more than 1.13 m/s, and even more preferably not more than 1.10 m/s. When this value is too large, the durability to cracking on repeated impact may worsen. On the other hand, when this value is too small, the spin rate on full shots may rise and the intended distance may be unattainable.

Specific Gravity Relationship Between Intermediate Layer and Cover

It is recommended that the difference between the specific gravity of the intermediate layer and the specific gravity of the cover be generally within ±0.15, preferably within ±0.10, and more preferably within ±0.05. That is, the value expressed as (specific gravity of cover)−(specific gravity of intermediate layer material) is generally equal to or more than −0.15, preferably equal to or more than −0.10, and more preferably equal to or more than −0.05. The upper limit is generally not more than 0.15, preferably not more than 0.10, and more preferably not more than 0.05. When the difference in the specific gravities of these layers is too large, in cases where the intermediate layer material and/or the cover material cannot be molded so as to be completely concentric with the layers positioned to the inside of these layers and end up being eccentric, significant wobbling of the ball may occur when struck with a putter.

Specific Gravity Relationship Between Intermediate Layer and Core

It is recommended that the difference between the specific gravity of the intermediate layer and the specific gravity of the core be generally within ±0.15, preferably within ±0.10, and more preferably within ±0.05. That is, the value expressed as (specific gravity of intermediate layer)−(specific gravity of core) is generally equal to or more than −0.15, preferably equal to or more than −0.10, and more preferably equal to or more than −0.05. The upper limit is generally not more than 0.15, preferably not more than 0.10, and more preferably not more than 0.05. When the difference in the specific gravities of these layers is too large, in cases where the intermediate layer material cannot be molded so as to be completely concentric with the core layer and end up being eccentric, significant wobbling of the ball may occur when struck with a putter.

Core Diameter and Ball Diameter

The relationship between the core diameter and the ball diameter, i.e., the value expressed as (core diameter)/(ball diameter), is preferably 0.860 or more, more preferably 0.870 or more, and even more preferably 0.880 or more. The upper limit is preferably not more than 0.940, more preferably not more than 0.910, and even more preferably not more than 0.890. When this value is too small, the ball initial velocity may become lower or the deflection of the overall ball may become smaller and the ball may become harder; also, the spin rate of the ball on full shots may rise, as a result of which the intended distance may be unattainable. On the other hand, when this value is too large, the spin rate on full shots may rise, making the intended distance unattainable, or the durability to cracking on repeated impact may worsen.

Difference Between Core and Ball Deflections

Letting C and B be the respective deflections in millimeters of the core and the ball when compressed under an initial load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf), it is critical for the value of C−B to be 1.20 mm or more. At a C−B value below 1.20 mm, the spin rate of the ball on shots with a utility club or an iron rises, making the intended distance unattainable. The value of C−B is preferably 1.25 mm or more, more preferably 1.30 mm or more, and even more preferably 1.35 mm or more. The upper limit is preferably not more than 1.80 mm, more preferably not more 1.70 mm, and even more preferably not more than 1.60 mm. When this value is too large, the durability to cracking on repeated impact may worsen or the initial velocity on full shots may decrease, as a result of which the intended distance may be unattainable.

Numerous dimples may be formed on the outside surface of the cover. The number of dimples arranged on the cover surface, although not particularly limited, is preferably at least 250, more preferably at least 300, and even more preferably at least 320. The upper limit is preferably not more than 380, more preferably not more than 350, and even more preferably not more than 340. When the number of dimples is higher than this range, the ball trajectory may become lower and the distance traveled by the ball may decrease. On the other hand, when the number of dimples is lower that this range, the ball trajectory may become higher and a good distance may not be achieved.

The dimple shapes used may be of one type or may be a combination of two or more types suitably selected from among, for example, circular shapes, various polygonal shapes, dewdrop shapes and oval shapes. When circular dimples are used, the dimple diameter may be set to at least about 2.5 mm and up to about 6.5 mm, and the dimple depth may be set to at least 0.08 mm and up to 0.30 mm.

In order for the aerodynamic properties to be fully manifested, it is desirable for the dimple coverage ratio on the spherical surface of the golf ball, i.e., the dimple surface coverage SR, which is the sum of the individual dimple surface areas, each defined by the flat plane circumscribed by the edge of a dimple, as a percentage of the spherical surface area of the ball were the ball to have no dimples thereon, to be set to at least 70% and not more than 90%. Also, to optimize the ball trajectory, it is desirable for the value VO, defined as the spatial volume of the individual dimples below the flat plane circumscribed by the dimple edge, divided by the volume of the cylinder whose base is the flat plane and whose height is the maximum depth of the dimple from the base, to be set to at least 0.35 and not more than 0.80. Moreover, it is preferable for the ratio VR of the sum of the volumes of the individual dimples, each formed below the flat plane circumscribed by the edge of the dimple, with respect to the volume of the ball sphere were the ball surface to have no dimples thereon, to be set to at least 0.6% and not more than 1.0%. Outside of the above ranges in these respective values, the resulting trajectory may not enable a good distance to be achieved and so the ball may not travel a satisfactory distance.

The multi-piece solid golf ball of the invention can be made to conform to the Rules of Golf for play. The inventive ball may be formed to a diameter which is such that the ball does not pass through a ring having an inner diameter of 42.672 mm and to a weight which is preferably between 45.0 and 45.93 g.

EXAMPLES

The following Examples and Comparative Examples are provided to illustrate the invention, and are not intended to limit the scope thereof.

Examples 1 to 3, Comparative Examples 1 to 7

Formation of Core

In Examples 1 to 3 and Comparative Examples 1 to 5, solid cores were produced by preparing rubber compositions for the respective examples shown in Table 1, and then molding and vulcanizing the compositions under the vulcanization conditions for each example shown in Table 1.

In Comparative Examples 6 and 7, the core is produced in the same way as above based on the formulations shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1 Example Comparative Example 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Core Polybutadiene A 100 formulation Polybutadiene B 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 (pbw) Polybutadiene C 100 Zinc acrylate 36.5 34.5 32.5 36.5 34.5 36.5 34.5 38.5 23.5 23.0 Organic Peroxide A 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.6 Organic Peroxide B 0.3 1.2 Water 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 Antioxidant A 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Antioxidant B 0.3 Zinc stearate 2 3 Zinc oxide 10.8 11.6 12.5 18.0 18.8 18.0 18.8 9.9 29.3 29.1 Zinc salt of 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.6 0.6 pentachlorothiophenol Vulcanization Temperature (° C.) 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 158 158 conditions Time (minutes) 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 14 13

Details on the above ingredients are provided below.

-   -   Polybutadiene A: Available under the trade name “BR01” from JSR         Corporation     -   Polybutadiene B: Available under the trade name “BR730” from JSR         Corporation     -   Polybutadiene C: Available under the trade name “T0700” from JSR         Corporation     -   Zinc acrylate: “ZN-DA85S” from Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd.     -   Organic Peroxide A: Dicumyl peroxide, available under the trade         name “Percumyl D” from NOF Corporation     -   Organic Peroxide B: A mixture of         1,1-di(t-butylperoxy)cyclohexane and silica, available under the         trade name “Perhexa C-40” from NOF Corporation     -   Water: Pure water from Seiki Chemical Industrial Co., Ltd.     -   Antioxidant A: 2,2′-Methylenebis(4-methyl-6-butylphenol),         available under the trade name “Nocrac NS-6” from Ouchi Shinko         Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.     -   Antioxidant B:2-Mercaptobenzimidazole, available under the trade         name “Nocrac MB” from Ouchi Shinko Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.     -   Zinc stearate: Available under the trade name “Zinc Stearate GP”         from NOF Corporation     -   Zinc oxide: Available as Grade 3 Zinc Oxide from Sakai Chemical         Co., Ltd.     -   Zinc salt of pentachlorothiophenol: Available from Wako Pure         Chemical Industries, Ltd.

Formation of Intermediate Layer and Cover (Outermost Layer)

Next, in Examples 1 to 3 and Comparative Examples 1 to 5, an intermediate layer was formed by using an injection mold to injection-mold Resin Materials No. 1 to 5 shown in Table 2 over the core surface. A cover (outermost layer) was then formed by using a different injection mold to injection-mold Resin Material No. 9 shown in Table 2 over the intermediate layer-encased sphere. Numerous dimples of a given configuration common to all of the Examples and Comparative Examples were formed at this time on the cover surface.

In Comparative Examples 6 and 7, an intermediate layer is formed by using an injection mold to injection-mold Resin Material No. 5 or 6 shown in Table 2 over the core surface. A cover (outermost layer) is then formed by using a different injection mold to injection-mold Resin Material No. 7 or 8 shown in Table 2 over the intermediate layer encased sphere. Numerous dimples of a given configuration common to all of the Examples and Comparative Examples are formed at this time on the cover surface.

TABLE 2 Acid content Metal (wt %) species No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6 No. 7 No. 8 No. 9 Himilan ® 1605 15 Na 50 50 44 30 Himilan ® 1855 10 Zn 30 Himilan ® 1557 12 Zn 15 15 15 15 Himilan ® 1706 15 Zn 35 35 AM 7318 18 Na 85 85 60 AM 7327 7 Zn 40 40 AN 4319 8 un- 42 100 neutralized AN 4221C 12 un- 14 neutralized Magnesium oxide 0.9 1.9 Magnesium stearate 33.6 70 Titanium oxide 4 4 3 Barium sulfate 20 20 Trimethylolpropane 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 TPU 100

Trade names and other details on the compounding ingredients in the above table are given below.

-   -   Himilan® 1605, Himilan® 1855, Himilan® 1557, Himilan® 1706, AM         7318, AM 7327: Ionomers available from Dow-Mitsui Polychemicals         Co., Ltd.     -   AN 4319, AN 4221C: Available under the trade name “Nucrel” from         Dow-Mitsui Polychemicals Co., Ltd.     -   Magnesium oxide: Kyowamag™ MF150, from Kyowa Chemical Industry         Co., Ltd.     -   Barium sulfate: Precipitated Barium Sulfate 300, available from         Sakai Chemical Co., Ltd.     -   Trimethylolpropane (TMP): Available from Tokyo Chemical Industry         Co., Ltd.     -   TPU: An ether-type thermoplastic polyurethane available under         the trade name “Pandex” from DIC Covestro Polymer, Ltd.;         material hardness (Shore D), 46

Various properties of the resulting golf balls, including the internal hardnesses of the core at various positions, the diameters of the core and each layer-encased sphere, the thickness and material hardness of each layer, the surface hardness of each layer-encased sphere and the initial velocity of each layer-encased sphere are evaluated by the following methods. The results are presented in Tables 3 and 4.

Core Hardness Profile

The indenter of a durometer is set substantially perpendicular to the spherical surface of the core and the surface hardness on the Shore C hardness scale is measured in accordance with ASTM D2240. The hardnesses at the center and specific positions of the core are measured as Shore C hardness values by perpendicularly pressing the indenter of a durometer against the center portion and the specific positions shown in Table 3 on the flat cross-section obtained by cutting the core into hemispheres. The P2 Automatic Rubber Hardness Tester (Kobunshi Keiki Co., Ltd.) equipped with a Shore C durometer can be used for measuring the hardness. The maximum value is read off as the hardness value. Measurements are all carried out in a 23±2° C. environment. The numbers in the table are Shore C hardness values.

Also, in the core hardness profile, letting Cc be the Shore C hardness at the center of the core, Cs be the Shore C hardness at the core surface, Cm be the Shore C hardness at the midpoint M between the core center and core surface, Cm−2, Cm−4 and Cm−6 be the respective Shore C hardnesses at positions 2 mm, 4 mm and 6 mm inward from the midpoint M and Cm+2, Cm+4 and Cm+6 be the respective Shore C hardnesses at positions 2 mm, 4 mm and 6 mm outward from the midpoint M, the surface areas A to F defined as follows

-   -   surface area A: ½×2×(Cm−4−Cm−6)     -   surface area B: ½×2×(Cm−2−Cm−4)     -   surface area C: ½×2×(Cm−Cm−2)     -   surface area D: ½×2×(Cm+2−Cm)     -   surface area E: ½×2×(Cm+4−Cm+2)     -   surface area F: ½×2×(Cm+6−Cm+4)         are calculated, and the values of the following six expressions         are determined.     -   (1) surface areas A+B     -   (2) surface area B+C     -   (3) surface areas D+E     -   (4) surface areas E+F     -   (5) (surface areas E+F)−(surface areas A+B)     -   (6) (surface areas D+E)−(surface areas B+C)

Surface areas A to F in the core hardness profile are explained in FIG. 2 , which is a graph plotted using the core hardness profile data from Example 1.

FIGS. 3 and 4 show graphs of the core hardness profiles for Examples 1 to 3 and Comparative Examples 1 to 7.

Diameters of Core and Intermediate Layer-Encased Sphere

The spheres to be measured are held isothermally for at least 3 hours in a thermostatic chamber adjusted to 23.9±1° C., following which they are measured in a 23.9±2° C. room. The diameters at five random places on the surface of each sphere are measured. Using the average of these measurements as the measured value for a single sphere, the average diameter for ten such spheres is determined.

Ball Diameter

The balls to be measured are held isothermally for at least 3 hours in a thermostatic chamber adjusted to 23.9±1° C., following which they are measured in a 23.9±2° C. room. The diameters at 15 random dimple-free areas on each ball are measured. Using the average of these 15 measurements as the measured value for a single ball, the average diameter for ten balls is determined.

Deflections of Core, Intermediate Layer-Encased Sphere and Ball

The core, intermediate layer-encased sphere or ball is placed on a hard plate and the amount of deflection when compressed under a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf) is measured. The amount of deflection is the measured value obtained by measurement in a 23.9±2° C. room after holding the sphere isothermally for at least 3 hours in a thermostatic chamber adjusted to 23.9±1° C. The rate at which pressure is applied by the head which compresses the core, the layer-encased sphere or the ball is set to 10 mm/s.

Material Hardnesses (Shore C and Shore D Hardnesses) of Intermediate Layer and Cover

The resin material for each layer is molded into a sheet having a thickness of 2 mm and left to stand at a temperature of 23±2° C. for at least two weeks. Three sheets are stacked together at the time of measurement. The Shore C hardness and Shore D hardness of each material are measured with Shore C and Shore D durometers that conform to ASTM D2240. A P2 Automatic Rubber Hardness Tester (Kobunshi Keiki Co., Ltd.) having mounted thereon a Shore C durometer or a Shore D durometer can be used for measuring the hardnesses. The maximum value is read off as the hardness value. The measurement method conforms with ASTM D2240.

Surface Hardnesses of Intermediate Layer-Encased Sphere and Ball

These hardnesses are measured by perpendicularly pressing an indenter against the surfaces of the respective spheres. The surface hardness of a ball (cover) is the value measured at a dimple-free area (land) on the surface of the ball. The Shore C hardness and Shore D hardness at the surface of each sphere are measured with Shore C and Shore D durometers that conform to ASTM D2240. A P2 Automatic Rubber Hardness Tester (Kobunshi Keiki Co., Ltd.) having mounted thereon a Shore C durometer or a Shore D durometer can be used for measuring the hardnesses. The maximum value is read off as the hardness value. The measurement method conforms with ASTM D2240.

Initial Velocities of the Spheres

The initial velocities of the respective spheres are measured as follows using a COR initial velocity tester custom-designed and built by Hye Precision Products according to R&A protocols.

The air pressure is changed in four stages—35.5, 36.5, 39.5 and 40.5 psi—and the sphere is fired at four inbound velocities by means of the respective air pressures and made to collide with a barrier, and the coefficient of restitution (COR) is measured. That is, the relationship between the inbound velocity and the COR is established by changing the air pressure in four stages. A correlation formula between the inbound velocity and the contact time is similarly established.

From these correlation formulas, the COR and the contact time (μs) at an inbound velocity of 43.83 m/s are determined and inserted into the following initial velocity conversion formula to compute the initial velocities of the respective spheres.

IV=136.8+136.3e+0.019tc

Here, e is the coefficient of restitution and tc is the contact time (μs) at an impact velocity of 143.8 ft/s (43.83 m/s).

In measurement of the initial velocities of the spheres, the inside diameter of the barrel used is 39.88 mm for the core in Examples 1 to 3 and Comparative Examples 1 to 5, 38.23 mm for the core in Comparative Examples 6 and 7, 41.53 mm for the intermediate layer-encased sphere in all the examples, and 43.18 mm for the ball in all the examples.

TABLE 3 Example Comparative Example 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Construction (piece) 3P 3P 3P 3P 3P 3P 3P 3P 3P 3P Core Diameter (mm) 38.05 38.04 37.99 38.04 38.04 38.04 38.04 38.06 37.37 37.34 Weight (g) 32.6 32.6 32.5 33.8 33.9 33.8 33.9 32.6 32.8 32.8 Specific gravity 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.13 1.20 1.20 Deflection (mm) 4.49 4.69 4.96 4.23 4.66 4.23 4.66 4.01 4.42 3.49 Initial velocity (m/s) 76.61 76.54 76.49 76.48 76.43 76.48 76.43 76.85 76.43 76.53 Cs (Shore C) 79.6 78.8 75.1 81.1 78.2 81.1 78.2 81.8 72.7 81.8 Cm + 6 (Shore C) 72.8 71.3 68.3 75.4 72.0 75.4 72.0 76.4 66.9 75.4 Cm + 4 (Shore C) 68.4 67.3 65.3 71.0 68.1 71.0 68.1 71.3 66.6 73.7 Cm + 2 (Shore C) 63.2 62.6 61.7 65.5 63.9 65.5 63.9 65.6 66.0 71.7 Cm (Shore C) 58.3 58.0 57.6 60.2 59.8 60.2 59.8 60.7 64.8 69.9 Cm − 2 (Shore C) 55.0 54.8 53.1 56.2 54.7 56.2 54.7 56.5 61.4 68.9 Cm − 4 (Shore C) 53.9 53.6 51.7 54.4 53.3 54.4 53.3 55.1 59.7 67.5 Cm − 6 (Shore C) 53.6 53.3 51.5 53.7 53.1 53.7 53.1 54.7 58.7 66.8 Cc (Shore C) 53.3 52.9 51.3 53.0 52.9 53.0 52.9 54.3 57.6 66.2 Cs − Cc (Shore C) 26.3 25.9 23.8 28.1 25.3 28.1 25.3 27.5 15.1 15.6 (Cs − Cc)/(Cm − Cc) 5.3 5.1 3.8 3.9 3.7 3.9 3.7 4.3 2.1 4.2 Surface ½ × 2 × 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.4 1.0 0.7 area A (Cm − 4 − Cm − 6) Surface ½ × 2 × 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.8 1.4 1.8 1.4 1.4 1.7 1.4 area B (Cm − 2 − Cm − 4) Surface ½ × 2 × 3.3 3.2 4.5 4.0 5.1 4.0 5.1 4.2 3.4 1.0 area C (Cm − Cm − 2) Surface ½ × 2 × 4.9 4.6 4.1 5.3 4.1 5.3 4.1 4.9 1.2 1.8 area D (Cm + 2 − Cm) Surface ½ × 2 × 5.2 4.7 3.6 5.5 4.2 5.5 4.2 5.7 0.6 2.0 area E (Cm + 4 − Cm + 2) Surface ½ × 2 × 4.4 4.0 3.0 4.4 3.9 4.4 3.9 5.1 0.3 1.7 area F (Cm + 6 − Cm + 4) Surface area E + 9.6 8.7 6.6 9.9 8.1 9.9 8.1 10.8 0.9 3.7 Surface area F (Surface areas E + F) − 8.2 7.2 5.0 7.4 6.5 7.4 6.5 9.0 −1.8 1.6 (Surface areas A + B) (Surface areas D + E) − 5.7 4.9 1.8 5.0 1.8 5.0 1.8 5.0 −3.3 1.4 (Surface areas B + C)

TABLE 4 Example Comparative Example 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Inter- Material No. 4 No. 4 No. 4 No. 1 No. 1 No. 2 No. 2 No. 3 No. 5 No. 6 mediate Thickness (mm) 1.51 1.51 1.52 1.52 1.52 1.51 1.51 1.50 1.32 1.46 layer Specific gravity 1.09 1.09 1.09 0.96 0.96 0.95 0.95 1.09 0.95 0.95 Material hardness 95 95 95 94 94 94 94 94 86 78 (Shore C) Material hardness 69 69 69 65 65 66 66 68 57 51 (Shore D) Inter- Diameter (mm) 41.06 41.05 41.03 41.08 41.07 41.06 41.06 41.06 40.00 40.25 mediate Weight (g) 40.6 40.5 40.4 40.9 40.8 40.8 40.8 40.6 38.7 39.4 layer- Deflection (mm) 3.38 3.52 3.72 3.34 3.60 3.31 3.56 3.12 3.95 3.24 encased Initial velocity (m/s) 77.55 77.62 77.51 77.74 77.61 77.69 77.59 77.80 77.40 77.11 sphere Surface hardness 98 98 98 97 97 98 97 98 93 92 (Shore C) Surface hardness 71 71 72 70 71 70 70 71 63 60 (Shore D) Intermediate layer surface hardness − 18 19 23 16 19 17 19 16 20 10 Core surface hardness (Shore C) Intermediate layer surface hardness − 45 45 47 44 44 45 44 44 35 26 Core center hardness (Shore C) Cover Material No. 9 No. No. 9 No. 9 No. 9 No. 9 No. 9 No. 9 No. 7 No. 8 Thickness (mm) 0.82 0.83 0.84 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.82 0.82 1.32 1.20 Specific gravity 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 0.98 0.97 Material hardness 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 83 88 (Shore C) Material hardness 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 55 59 (Shore D) Ball Diameter (mm) 42.71 42.70 42.72 42.70 42.69 42.69 42.71 42.71 42.64 42.65 Weight (g) 45.3 45.3 45.3 45.6 45.5 45.6 45.6 45.4 45.3 45.3 Deflection (mm) 3.09 3.22 3.40 3.14 3.35 3.04 3.27 2.89 3.51 3.08 Initial velocity (m/s) 77.18 77.19 77.11 77.27 77.20 77.28 77.25 77.29 77.11 77.38 Surface hardness 85 84 85 85 85 85 84 85 92 95 (Shore C) Surface hardness 57 58 58 57 57 58 58 58 61 65 (Shore D) Intermediate layer surface hardness − 13 14 13 12 12 13 13 13 1 −3 Ball surface hardness (Shore C) Core deflection − Ball deflection (mm) 1.40 1.47 1.56 1.09 1.31 1.19 1.39 1.12 0.91 0.41 Core diameter/Ball diameter 0.891 0.891 0.889 0.891 0.891 0.891 0.891 0.891 0.876 0.875 Intermediate layer thickness − 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.71 0.71 0.70 0.69 0.68 0.00 0.25 Cover thickness (mm) Specific Cover material specific gravity − 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.03 0.03 0.02 gravity Intermediate layer specific gravity differences Intermediate layer specific gravity − −0.04 −0.04 −0.04 −0.22 −0.22 −0.22 −0.22 −0.04 −0.25 −0.25 Core specific gravity Initial Intermediate layer-encased sphere − 0.37 0.43 0.40 0.47 0.41 0.41 0.34 0.51 0.29 −0.27 velocity Ball (m/s) differences Envelope layer-encased sphere − 0.94 1.08 1.02 1.26 1.18 1.21 1.16 0.95 0.97 0.58 Core (m/s)

The flight (utility club, I #6 and I #8), controllability on approach shots and durability to repeated impact of each golf ball are evaluated by the following methods. The results are shown in Table 5.

Evaluation of Flight (Utility Club)

A utility club is mounted on a golf swing robot and the spin rate and total distance traveled by the ball when struck at a head speed (HS) of 38 m/s are measured. The club used is the JGR H2 (2016 model) manufactured by Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd.

Rating Criteria

-   -   Good: Total distance is 166.0 m or more     -   NG: Total distance is less than 166.0 m

Evaluation of Flight (I #6)

A number six iron (I #6) is mounted on a golf swing robot and the spin rate and total distance traveled by the ball when struck at a head speed of 35 m/s are measured. The club used is the JGR Forged I #6 (2016 model) manufactured by Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd.

Rating Criteria

-   -   Good: Total distance is 148.5 m or more     -   NG: Total distance is less than 148.5 m

Evaluation of Flight (I #8)

A number eight iron (I #8) is mounted on a golf swing robot and the spin rate and total distance traveled by the ball when struck at a head speed of 35 m/s are measured. The club used is the JGR Forged I #8 (2016 model) manufactured by Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd.

Rating Criteria

-   -   Good: Total distance is 121.0 m or more     -   NG: Total distance is less than 121.0 m

Evaluation of Spin Rate on Approach Shots

A sand wedge is mounted on a golf swing robot and the amount of spin by the ball when struck at a head speed of 15 m/s is rated according to the criteria shown below. The spin rate is measured with a launch monitor immediately after the ball has been struck. The sand wedge used is the TourStage TW-03 (loft angle, 57°; 2002 model) manufactured by Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd.

Rating Criteria

-   -   Good: Spin rate is 4,500 rpm or more     -   NG: Spin rate is less than 4,500 rpm

Durability to Cracking on Repeated Impact

The durability of the golf ball is evaluated using an ADC Ball COR Durability Tester manufactured by Automated Design Corporation (U.S.A.). This tester fires a golf ball pneumatically and causes it to consecutively strike two metal plates arranged in parallel. The average number of shots required for the golf ball to crack is treated as the durability. Here, the average number of shots is obtained by furnishing ten balls of the same type for testing, firing each ball, and averaging the number of shots required for each of the ten balls to crack. The type of tester used is a horizontal COR tester, and the incident velocity against the metal plates is set to 43 m/s.

Evaluation Criteria

-   -   Good: Average number of shots is 150 times or more     -   NG: Average number of shots is 149 times or less

TABLE 5 Example Comparative Example 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Flight Utility club Spin rate (rpm) 4,245 4,237 4,173 4,245 4,192 4,242 4,151 4,383 4,169 4,234 HS: 38 m/s Total distance 166.1 166.4 167.6 166.5 166.3 165.3 166.1 165.1 162.8 166.6 (m) Rating good good good good good NG good NG NG good I#6 Spin rate (rpm) 4,643 4,528 4,438 4,641 4,539 4,679 4,549 4,807 4,750 5,243 HS: 35 m/s Total distance 150.6 148.9 150.0 147.9 150.2 150.1 151.1 147.1 145.9 144.8 (m) Rating good good good NG good good good NG NG NG I#8 Spin rate (rpm) 5,997 5,961 5,861 6,012 5,949 6,027 5,897 6,238 6,347 7,006 HS: 35 m/s Total distance 121.5 121.3 122.8 121.9 122.3 123.0 122.8 122.8 119.1 118.2 (m) Rating good good good good good good good good NG NG Approach Sand wedge Spin rate (rpm) 4,662 4,650 4,579 4,740 4,676 4,770 4,669 4,782 4,311 3,993 shots HS: 15 m/s Rating good good good good good good good good NG NG Durability to cracking No. of shots 159 162 153 171 136 128 125 212 196 293 on repeated impact until ball cracked Rating good good good good NG NG NG good good good

As demonstrated by the results in Table 5, the golf balls of Comparative Examples 1 to 7 are inferior in the following respects to the golf balls according to the present invention that are obtained in Examples 1 to 3.

In Comparative Example 1, the value of (core deflection−ball deflection) is 1.20 mm or less and the value of (initial velocity of intermediate layer-encased sphere−initial velocity of core) is larger than 1.15 m/s. As a result, the distance traveled by the ball on shots with an iron (I #6) is inferior.

In Comparative Example 2, the value of (initial velocity of intermediate layer-encased sphere−initial velocity of core) is larger than 1.15 m/s. As a result, the durability to cracking on repeated impact is poor.

In Comparative Example 3, the value of (core deflection−ball deflection) is 1.20 mm or less and the value of (initial velocity of intermediate layer-encased sphere−initial velocity of core) is larger than 1.15 m/s. As a result, the distance traveled by the ball on shots with a utility club is inferior and the durability to cracking on repeated impact is poor.

In Comparative Example 4, the value of (initial velocity of intermediate layer-encased sphere−initial velocity of core) is larger than 1.15 m/s. As a result, the durability to cracking on repeated impact is poor.

In Comparative Example 5, the value of (core deflection−ball deflection) is 1.20 mm or less. As a result, the distances traveled by the ball on shots with a utility club and on shots with an iron (I #6) are inferior.

In Comparative Example 6, the value of (core deflection−ball deflection) is 1.20 mm or less. As a result, the distances traveled by the ball on shots with a utility club and on shots with irons (I #6 and I #8) are all inferior, in addition to which the spin rate on approach shots is low.

In Comparative Example 7, the value of (core deflection−ball deflection) is 1.20 mm or less, the ball initial velocity is equal to or greater than the initial velocity of the intermediate layer-encased sphere, and the value of (initial velocity of intermediate layer-encased sphere−initial velocity of core) is smaller than 0.65 m/s. As a result, the distances traveled by the ball on shots with irons (I #6 and I #8) are inferior, in addition to which the spin rate on approach shots is low.

Japanese Patent Application No. 2022-114576 is incorporated herein by reference. Although some preferred embodiments have been described, many modifications and variations may be made thereto in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described without departing from the scope of the appended claims. 

1. A multi-piece solid golf ball comprising a core, an intermediate layer and a cover, wherein the core is formed of a rubber composition, the intermediate layer and the cover are each formed of a resin composition; the core has an initial velocity, the intermediate layer-encased sphere obtained by encasing the core with the intermediate layer has an initial velocity and the ball obtained by encasing the intermediate layer-encased sphere with the cover has an initial velocity which together satisfy the following two conditions: (initial velocity of ball)<(initial velocity of intermediate layer-encased sphere), 0.65≤(initial velocity of intermediate layer-encased sphere)−(initial velocity of core)≤1.15 m/s; and letting C and B be the respective deflections in millimeters of the core and the ball when compressed under an initial load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf), the value of C−B is 1.20 mm or more.
 2. The golf ball of claim 1, wherein the ball satisfies the following condition: Shore C surface hardness of ball<Shore C surface hardness of intermediate layer encased sphere>Shore C surface hardness of core.
 3. The golf ball of claim 1, wherein the resin composition of the intermediate layer includes a high-acid ionomer resin having an acid content of 16 wt % or more.
 4. The golf ball of claim 1, wherein the intermediate layer has a specific gravity of 1.05 or more.
 5. The golf ball of claim 1, wherein the intermediate layer includes a granular inorganic filler.
 6. The golf ball of claim 1, wherein the cover and the intermediate layer have respective specific gravities with a difference therebetween of not more than 0.15.
 7. The golf ball of claim 1, wherein the ball satisfies the following condition: thickness of cover<thickness of intermediate layer.
 8. The golf ball of claim 1, wherein the core has a diameter of from 36.7 to 40.1 mm.
 9. The golf ball of claim 1, wherein the core has a hardness profile in which, letting Cc be the Shore C hardness at a center of the core, Cs be the Shore C hardness at a surface of the core, Cm be the Shore C hardness at a midpoint M between the core center and the core surface, Cm−2, Cm−4 and Cm−6 be the respective Shore C hardnesses at positions 2 mm, 4 mm and 6 mm inward from the midpoint M and Cm+2, Cm+4 and Cm+6 be the respective Shore C hardnesses at positions 2 mm, 4 mm and 6 mm outward from the midpoint M, and defining surface areas A to F as follows surface area A: ½×2×(Cm−4−Cm−6) surface area B: ½×2×(Cm−2−Cm−4) surface area C: ½×2×(Cm−Cm−2) surface area D: ½×2×(Cm+2−Cm) surface area E: ½×2×(Cm+4−Cm+2) surface area F: ½×2×(Cm+6−Cm+4), the core satisfies the condition: (surface area E+surface area F)−(surface area A+surface area B)≥1.0.
 10. The golf ball of claim 1, wherein the ball satisfies the following condition: (surface area D+surface area E)−(surface area B+surface area C)≥1.0. 